Wednesday, June 15, 2011

The Jane Goodall Institute

images Jane Goodall Institute The Jane Goodall Institute. The Jane Goodall Institute
  • The Jane Goodall Institute


  • ItIsNotFunny
    10-21 04:41 PM
    It is tricky. The intent can be proved only by how long the employee has worked for sponsor. If he/she worked considerable period (lets say for 2-3 years in non-immigrant visa (H.L,E) before filing 485 and worked for about 1 year after filing 485) then, it is very easy for the employee to prove his/her intent to have a permanent employment relationship with sponser, if employer try to revoke 140 based on the fact that employee does not have intent. The longivity of the employment relationship with sponser is a great proof. Some people are abusing (by misguidence of few lawyers, as they claim GC is for future job) AC21, without even working for single day with sponser, trying to get GC. USCIS may be controlling that kind of abuse.

    One historical background reason for AC21 is that, in 2000, even though all catagories are "current", INS was very slow in approving 485. The delay for approval of 485 in year 2000 is caused by USCIS poor customer service. It took atleast 2 years for 485 approval, though the visa numbers were continously available for the entire 2 years. Therefore, the AC21 is an incentive for USCIS delay.

    Now, if the visa numbers are continously available (for example EB1, EB2-ROW) USCIS is approving 485 within 6 months, except july 07 fiasco surge. So now AC21 users are only those who suffers in retrogression, not by USCIS administartive delay. That may be the another reason why USCIS becoming hard on AC21.


    I understand what you say but interpretation differs from IO to IO. It still goes to chances....




    wallpaper The Jane Goodall Institute The Jane Goodall Institute. The Jane Goodall Institute for
  • The Jane Goodall Institute for


  • ramus
    09-09 11:50 AM
    Thanks a lot.. Wish you could come to rally but understand your prior commitement...

    Thank you..



    Paypal contribution of $300. I cannot make it to the rally because of prior commitments. Thanks to all who are going to be at the rally in person.

    I feel good after making the contribution. Hopefully, several others will join this contribution drive and experience this good feeling first hand.

    Good luck to all.




    The Jane Goodall Institute. the Jane Goodall Institute
  • the Jane Goodall Institute


  • desi3933
    08-04 03:28 PM
    I would request everybody to send out the mails ASAP. This will certainly help....
    ----------------
    Pani, I was not able to upload the word doc. Can you make a word document from this and upload it...

    -------------------------------------------------------

    .................
    ................
    ................



    Did you go over points raised by internet in this post
    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=271211&postcount=12




    2011 The Jane Goodall Institute for The Jane Goodall Institute. Jane Goodall Institute#39;s Roots
  • Jane Goodall Institute#39;s Roots


  • krishmunn
    08-12 12:11 PM
    Not true. Whatever they can outsource, its already gone. There are certain position where the clients demand onsite resource. I am not supporting this bill in anyway, I hate infy as much as I hate this bill.

    I agree to gc28262. Back in 90s when outsourcing started, major Indian IT companies used to have a 50-50 onsite/offshoe component (for large clients/projects). This has now come down to 10-90 onsite/offshore because clients are getting the same level of service.
    For example, it was once believed that DBAs must be located at client site. Now, we often see DBA support provided from India.

    This causes too much load on the onsite person but who cares as long as there is a steady supply. The bill will simply change the model to 5-95 . Out of these 5 positions cut-down , 4 might be H1 but at least 1 is a citizen/LPR whose job will be eliminated. Along with that will go the number of services these 4 H1s were using in US and the amount they were contributing to US economy.

    USCs who think this bill will create more jobs for Americans are living in a fools world.



    more...

    The Jane Goodall Institute. Jane Goodall didn#39;t have a
  • Jane Goodall didn#39;t have a


  • raj7480
    08-01 02:21 PM
    When you have these news articles ready...one of the easiest way to circulate them is using a news wire agency.

    I have used http://www.prweb.com/ before for my company news releases. It is free and if you want a broader reach pay $80. It is very effective.

    It is a good idea to release it when something related to immigration is going on in senate or house. During this time, all major news network pickup articles from these wires based on keywords like "immigration, border issue etc"

    So make sure you add appropriate keywords when you do the release.




    The Jane Goodall Institute. Dr. Jane Goodall#39;s work.
  • Dr. Jane Goodall#39;s work.


  • Dhundhun
    06-25 02:53 PM
    I called Rep Lamar Smith office. The lady who picked up the phone asked me we are getting lot of calls. She asked me are you in supprot of the bill? I told her yes. I also told her that I am having master's degree from USA. My children are top student but may not get admission in some of NJ medical college just because we did not get GC since last 7 years. So we need help from Rep Lamar Smith to make USA more competitive. She also wanted to know that from where I was calling.

    She told me that she will convey the message to Rep Lamar Smith.

    This is thread for What America is losing... - corrected spelling

    I find it out of context. Please elaborate - I feel some hiddem message is there - needs to clearly come out.



    more...

    The Jane Goodall Institute. A program of the Jane Goodall
  • A program of the Jane Goodall


  • nk2006
    10-21 05:24 PM
    Some people are abusing (by misguidence of few lawyers, as they claim GC is for future job) AC21, without even working for single day with sponser, trying to get GC. USCIS may be controlling that kind of abuse.

    Now, if the visa numbers are continously available (for example EB1, EB2-ROW) USCIS is approving 485 within 6 months, except july 07 fiasco surge. So now AC21 users are only those who suffers in retrogression, not by USCIS administartive delay. That may be the another reason why USCIS becoming hard on AC21.
    Thanks Ramba for your insights.

    Whatever the reasons - its apparent USCIS is not following the AC21 regulations and it is not fair. I believe, AC21 regulations are made with an objective of improving immigration rules for 21st century (and thus the name American Competetiveness for 21st century) and provide some mobility for the applicants while their GC applications are pending. The delay in application processing is still relevant (actually its more severe) - irrespective of whether its caused by processing or because of lack of visa numbers. AC21 regulations never mentioned about the origin of delay or the longivity of applicant with original company. Changing interpretation of a rule they made, that too without notice is unfair and maybe even unlawful.

    So far I was thinking that its a case of misinformed IO rejecting I485 once they see a I140 revocation. But rejecting MTR on the grounds that employee has left the company on his/her own and so does not have intent of continuing in the job is just plain twisting of their own rules. And we need a much bigger effort - if its a case of a few misinformed USCIS employees incorrectly rejecting I485 - then it could have been fixed with a low key effort that we are doing. We are seeing more rejections based on unknown "interpretations" - and even MTR getting rejected - it kind of gives a feeling that they have a bigger agenda here and we need to fight on a bigger scale.




    2010 the Jane Goodall Institute The Jane Goodall Institute. Jane Goodall Institute
  • Jane Goodall Institute


  • 485Mbe4001
    09-12 02:13 PM
    I agree with the posts to a certain extent but the last time we sent mass letters only 5000 letters were collected. A couple of people were responsible for collecting 500-1000 letters each. You can caculate the percentage of letter writers of the who actually sent out the letters.

    We talk about num usa etal.. bear in mind they have lots of resources and volunteers willing to call and write letters. We keep fighting about EB3 Vs EB2, red dots and green dots and other 'important' issues, very few actually make the calls. The ones who work, keep working while others demand answers as to why issues are not fixed, the rest of us just like discussing issues to death on the forums... just my 2 (pick your denomination).

    I totally agree with "bsbawa10" , Not many people will invilve if its a matter of spending 30-50$ and for sure stuff like Calculators and clock will go to the Kids of USCIS officers and their friends as Thanksgiving "Gifts". I think we should send mass letters to all the involved agencies with posters. Not only all the people will be involved, it will be difficult for USCIS to redirect the stuff to some orphanage/veterans Hospitals etc. Just my 2 cents.



    more...

    The Jane Goodall Institute. The Jane Goodall Institute is
  • The Jane Goodall Institute is


  • rongha_2000
    04-30 03:34 PM
    And the situation prior to surge wasnt any better either. I remember in 2006, the PD for India EB3 was April 2001 and now its Nov 2001. :mad:

    OK so here it is, it will get 2 years before the backlogs due to the surge clear and to get back to normal... :mad:




    hair Jane Goodall Institute#39;s Roots The Jane Goodall Institute. company:quot;The Jane Goodall Institute/dc Area Officequot; Job Trends graph
  • company:quot;The Jane Goodall Institute/dc Area Officequot; Job Trends graph


  • ItIsNotFunny
    03-12 04:47 PM
    Just got the email that Card Production Ordered. I hope it means the GC has been approved. Do any of you know of any situation like this?

    This is unbelievable!

    Your PD is Apr 03 EB3 India and you got your GC. You won a lottery buddy. Any LUDs etc in recent past?



    more...

    The Jane Goodall Institute. the Jane Goodall Institute
  • the Jane Goodall Institute


  • shivarajan
    03-07 02:50 AM
    Jai Ho..... "Iam alive again (and so do my hope)"

    This is what i like about "hope".... u just awaked the dead me~
    Sire, I will be hopeful till the last nanosecond until visa bulletin from mumbai consulate gets published! :-)




    hot Jane Goodall didn#39;t have a The Jane Goodall Institute. The Jane Goodall Institute
  • The Jane Goodall Institute


  • Blessing&Lifeisbeautiful
    07-24 04:11 PM
    Calling all Schedule A professionals? Anyone concurrently filing this July?



    more...

    house Inquiries to the Jane Goodall The Jane Goodall Institute. Website : Jane Goodall
  • Website : Jane Goodall


  • DSLStart
    03-11 01:22 PM
    Congratulations! Best luck for your journey to U.S. citizenship ;)
    My application was finally approved yesterday after almost 7 years in queue. Here is the sequence of events right before the approval.

    RFE email on 02/13/09
    2nd Biometrics Notice received on 02/17/09
    Lawyer receives RFE for EVL, EAD cards and Marriage Certificate on 02/24/09
    Completed Code 3 Biometrics on 02/26/09
    Soft LUD immediately after Biometrics on 02/26/09
    USCIS receives RFE reply on 02/27/09, Hard LUD and email on the same day
    Another soft LUD on 03/02/09
    CPO email on 03/10/09
    Welcome email on 03/10/09

    My PD has been current for a long time, but my application had not been touched and then suddenly USCIS became a model of efficiency. I am sure they are opening applications and approving or RFE'ing all they can. Hang in there guys.




    tattoo Dr. Jane Goodall#39;s work. The Jane Goodall Institute. The Jane Goodall Institute was
  • The Jane Goodall Institute was


  • adhantari
    07-06 03:52 PM
    You morons, You have spent so much time in useless discussions and anti-immigrants are laughing at your foolishness. Its high time your greencards applications get a denial or RFE. You will come crying to IV to save your status. Or else you will be deported. That is all you can do. You guys have got sub labor or faked your resumes and now you want someone to be accountable to you. First learn to be accountable to yourself and your values.
    Here is what antis are telling you aholes:


    STFU you freeloaders

    just frustered bcoz you are still stuck in Labor while mostly everybody filed their GC right...... I can understand...... but you should channel your frustration in good way.... may be try seeing a shrink...... I will pitch in $1 if you get shrink help......



    more...

    pictures A program of the Jane Goodall The Jane Goodall Institute. the Jane Goodall Institute
  • the Jane Goodall Institute


  • spicy_guy
    09-02 01:00 AM
    I'm only posting a response cause my response is sad and funny at same time. No one's beat me yet???

    Came in Dec 1990
    Been on various visas including F1 (grad and undergrad) and H1.
    Didn't get to file GC till 2007 unfortunately...

    Oh Man! You should be in your 40s now....And you are still waiting for GC. You must be knowing this. You will have to wait for 15+ years more for your DMAN GC!! By that you may have been retired.




    dresses The Jane Goodall Institute The Jane Goodall Institute. the Jane Goodall Institute
  • the Jane Goodall Institute


  • amitjoey
    03-02 07:01 PM
    Yes, if we do not do anything, then yes, we will only get our GC's as per the calculator- which is 2024 and beyond. If we want it earlier, we need to educate: Get vocal: Vocal about reforming employment based immigration laws. Lobby the government: (which means we need to contribute money to IV to make a war-chest- to pay the lobbyist.), Get noticed: Which means we have to meet our lawmakers.



    more...

    makeup The Jane Goodall Institute is The Jane Goodall Institute. Inquiries to the Jane Goodall
  • Inquiries to the Jane Goodall


  • GC_Applicant
    07-17 11:02 PM
    I am in Orange County. Count Me in.




    girlfriend The Jane Goodall Institute was The Jane Goodall Institute. The Jane Goodall Institute
  • The Jane Goodall Institute


  • irock
    09-11 05:12 PM
    I'm in.




    hairstyles the Jane Goodall Institute The Jane Goodall Institute. the Jane Goodall Institute
  • the Jane Goodall Institute


  • Sri_1975
    07-14 02:20 PM
    Done.




    gene77
    03-22 09:28 PM
    @AllVNeedGCPC : Did you get any updates on I-485

    @gene77 : When was your I-140 approved and what is your priority date.

    Thanks!

    I wonder what is needed now? Has anyone experienced RFE at this juncture? What should I be expecting ?

    @piliriver: 140 approved last month, PD Oct-2004




    subh21
    01-14 04:46 PM
    Does anyone know to what address USCIS mails the AP. Is it the lawyer's office or is it the home address?

    I am planning to move and information on this will be very helpful. Thanks!

    I have a similar question -- the USCIS site says document mailed on Dec 26th, but I am yet to receive it. I have not heard from the Lawyers either. USCIS mailed the receipt to the lawyers but EAD to our home, what's the deal with AP - home or lawyers?



    No comments:

    Post a Comment